Settings and activity
24 results found
-
61 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joanne Geary supported this idea · -
57 votesJoanne Geary supported this idea ·
-
481 votes
Hi everyone, appreciate there are more regions users would like to see us adopt solutions for and we'll keep you in the know of any progress, here.
In the UK, we have some updates with the bill payments method with Crezco. You now have more control of your cashflows with the ability to schedule bills to be paid at a future date using direct bank transfer. This'll help avoid potential bank charges for same day transactions, and missing due dates. Along with this you'll also be able to stay up to date with your payments with real-time payment status in Xero. Meaning you don't have to log into your bank to check the status of each bill payment. With an overview of all payments made using direct bank transfer, you have an accurate record of which suppliers have been paid, and when.
Joanne Geary supported this idea · -
65 votes
Hi all 👋 thanks for sharing this idea and contributing your feedback on how it would help save time and reduce delivery errors. This has all been sent to and considered by our product teams.
I wanted to jump in here to share that this is a feature that our team are looking to develop in Purchase Orders in the long term - there are a few other pieces of work lined up before. We'll shift to Under review and keep you updated of any progress, here.
In the meantime, one way to make the physical address the default delivery address when creating purchases orders is by using a Custom DOCX branding theme, and either use the relevant merge fields, or even enter the default address in plain text on the template. You might then have a separate ‘normal’ theme if you want some orders to go to the Postal…
Joanne Geary supported this idea ·
When I save an invoice to a PDF it formats the name as Invoice INV-0100, when I save a quote it saves it as Quote QU0078 (even though it is QU-0078), it also saves a PO as Purchase Order PO0235 (even though its PO-0235)
This is inconsistent.