Settings and activity
3 results found
-
2 votes
Thank you for sharing this suggestion.
We’re moving this idea forward to gather community support and feedback. This will help us understand how many customers would benefit from being able to mark individual registered assets as ‘Do not print’ on the Depreciation Schedule, particularly when an asset has no remaining book value.
Please vote for this idea and add a comment if this would help your organisation. Feedback about your current workflow and how often you need this option will also help us assess the level of interest and inform future consideration. 🙂
Rex Eavestaff
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
Thanks for taking the time to explain how you’re using the Pack date range and why you’d like a “Last financial year -1” option. This isn’t something we’re actively working on right now, so we’re moving your idea to Gaining support. This lets other partners and small businesses add their vote and specific scenarios, which helps our product teams understand how many people are impacted and how this should be prioritised alongside other reporting work.
In the meantime, the best available workaround is to set the prior year using a Custom date range and reuse that report pack where possible.
Rex Eavestaff
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Just need the account code column to print next to the Account column. This would help in identifying where split payments are going to the correct codes or where clients have coded items incorrectly ie an expense code used for an income source.
For the documents sorted by account code or name you can use the account transactions report for the rquired period