Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Vicky Allsop commented  · 

    Yes this would be really useful. Would also be good if the 'all' expenses option could not only be filtered by name, but also by the date of the expense, that way you can double-check that things aren't being expensed twice

    Vicky Allsop supported this idea  · 
  2. 262 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi everyone, we appreciate the number of users that'd like to see more mechanisms to assign and control who approves specific employee's claims.

    Our product teams have a close eye on this idea, and while this feature is not in the roadmap atm, they'll keep reviewing this as they continue to plan and prioritise work for Expenses. So, if there us any shift in status we'll share an update to keep you all informed on the idea, here.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Vicky Allsop commented  · 

    When people are inputting mileage from home they are sharing their home postcode in the description of the journey, that can be visible to all without even clicking on it - therefore not GDPR compliant. Being only visible for the line manager who was allocated to approve them would resolve this, plus make it easier to work through the list of those needing to be checked without having to constantly re-filter the page each time you click into an expense to check it and want to return to the next expense that staff member has inputted.

    Current set up means approvers are less likely to actually check the expenses have been input correctly and just click the 'approve' button from that list - causing more issues down the road when staff have allocated to the wrong account or project etc, which can't be seen without clicking onto each expense.

    Vicky Allsop supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Vicky Allsop shared this idea  ·