Settings and activity
7 results found
-
197 votes
Hi team, as we continue shaping our product plans, we wanted to come back with an update here. While this is something we may revisit in the future, we want to be transparent that there are no plans to develop additional custom relationship types this year.
We’ll continue to keep an eye on the level of support for this idea, but we also wanted to be upfront with you now. If anything changes, we’ll be sure to share a further update.
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Michelle Kinscher
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesMichelle Kinscher
supported this idea
·
-
304 votes
Thanks everyone for the continued support on this idea, and for sharing the detail of how this'd help in your day-to-day work.
We understand this request is especially important for customers and advisors who are working with PDF statements when a direct bank feed isn’t available, when a bank doesn’t offer a usable CSV export, or when manually converting and cleaning statement data adds extra time and effort.
When we last updated this idea, we shared that PDF bank statement conversion had been introduced in limited regions. Since then, we’ve continued to look closely at where we can best improve the document capture and data entry experience across Xero.
Hubdoc remains a core part of our offering, however to be transparent we’re currently focused on delivering more efficiencies through Xero directly - such as with our new Smart Document Capture within Xero Files.
With that in mind, there isn’t any…
Michelle Kinscher
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
Hi everyone, thanks for sharing your feedback on this idea 🙂
We can see the value in this, managing inter-entity loans more easily across entities in Workpapers, especially where you’re trying to match balances and reduce manual cross-checking. We’re moving this idea to Gaining Support so others can vote and add their use cases too. The more detail you can share about how you’d use this in practice, the easier it is for our team to understand the impact and prioritise future improvements.
This is something that’s on our radar, but we don’t have a timeframe to share right now. We’ll continue to monitor the feedback here and will update this thread if there’s more to share.
Michelle Kinscher
supported this idea
·
-
101 votes
Thanks so much for taking the time to share this idea and for adding your feedback here 💙
We hear that you feel this would be an improvement, and while this is something the team has considered, it’s not currently in the pipeline and we’re unable to share plans to take this forward right now. We know that may be disappointing, especially given the support for this idea, and we really appreciate you continuing to tell us what would make the biggest difference for your practice. If anything changes, we’ll be sure to update you on this thread.
Michelle Kinscher
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesMichelle Kinscher
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesMichelle Kinscher
supported this idea
·
Please! This is important to have this relationship! It's not a 'custom' relationship it's a gosh dang basic type of entity! Please listen to your users!