Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Lennon supported this idea  · 
  2. 105 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Lennon supported this idea  · 
  3. 173 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Lennon supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Lennon commented  · 

    Can this be made a priority? Would like to see ex-spouse added to the list too. For a number of clients we still represent both husband and wife, although divorced. We don't want a staff member to make an assumption based on surname, or a prior yr return when they were together. How are firms tackling this in the interim?