Skip to content

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 198 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi team, as we continue shaping our product plans, we wanted to come back with an update here. While this is something we may revisit in the future, we want to be transparent that there are no plans to develop additional custom relationship types this year.

    We’ll continue to keep an eye on the level of support for this idea, but we also wanted to be upfront with you now. If anything changes, we’ll be sure to share a further update.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Donna Murphy (practice) commented  · 

    We have a significant number of unit trusts and the unitholding is the defining factor of a unit trust - so surely it cannot be that hard to add one relationship type to XPM to cover a business structure that is already a default structure in XPM.

    Donna Murphy (practice) supported this idea  · 
  2. 23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

     ·  3 comments  ·  Practice tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Donna Murphy (practice) commented  · 

    With large inter-related taxpayers, this has been one of the most used features of Myob tax by our practice for over twenty years. This reduces the processing time and also the opportunity of error rekeying data multiple times.

    Donna Murphy (practice) supported this idea  ·