Skip to content

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 234 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for sharing your idea, Nuno, and for letting us know the changes that matter most for you.

    We've reviewed your idea to increase tracking categories and tracking options, and now it's up to the community to get behind and support it. Make sure you share your idea with any colleagues that this could benefit so they can add their vote too!

    Along with votes, other members can now comment to share additional detail about how your idea could improve their experience with Xero.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thomas Chang commented  · 

    It has now been almost a year since Xero's response on 22 October 2025, with no meaningful follow-up, no explanation of what is holding this up, and no indication that anything is actually progressing.
    At this point, there seem to be only two possibilities: either Xero does not take customer feedback seriously, or a relatively basic enhancement has somehow defeated its programmers for nearly a year.
    We are not asking Xero to rebuild its accounting engine. We are asking for additional tracking dimensions — functionality that proper ERP systems such as JD Edwards have supported for decades. If Xero's legacy code really makes this so difficult, perhaps someone should feed the relevant C#/ASP.NET code into an AI coding assistant and see whether it can make more progress than Xero has managed in the past year.
    As a Xero shareholder as well as a customer, that is what concerns me most. If Xero genuinely wants to move upmarket and compete with proper ERP platforms, it cannot keep treating basic dimensional reporting as an advanced feature request.
    Either the product architecture cannot keep up, or the product team does not care enough to fix it. Neither is particularly reassuring for customers or shareholders.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thomas Chang commented  · 

    Having worked with proper ERP systems, it’s hard to understand why Xero limits users to just two tracking categories. In practice, that’s nowhere near enough if you want to do any meaningful analysis or drill into your data properly. Most organisations need to look at transactions across multiple dimensions (e.g. department, activity, funding source), and two categories just doesn’t cut it. It’s also confusing that you can create additional tracking categories, but can’t actually use them without archiving existing ones. If the system supports more, it would make sense to let users actually use them. This feels like an unnecessary limitation that makes reporting harder than it needs to be.

    Thomas Chang supported this idea  · 
  2. 62 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Thomas Chang commented  · 

    Row-level security is a basic control feature in most mature financial systems. The fact that Xero still cannot restrict access to specific tracking categories by user role is a major limitation for organisations with multiple departments, entities, or cost centres.

    If Xero wants to position itself as a serious mid-market finance platform rather than just a cloud bookkeeping product, then granular permission controls need to become a priority. Finance teams should be able to give users access only to the areas they are responsible for, without exposing the entire organisation’s financial activity.

    This is not an exotic enterprise feature — it is standard governance, internal control, and data segregation. Surprising that it still doesn’t exist.