Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 620 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for continuing to share your feedback and engage with us through this idea, everyone.

    We recognise the importance of providing greater flexibility when managing the authorisation of super payments, particularly now that Payday Super is in effect.

    I’m pleased to share that we’re working on an update to authorisation for Xero Payroll’s auto super.

    You’ll soon be able to nominate a list of eligible authorisers when setting up auto super or editing an existing registration. Each super payment will still require approval from one person, but you’ll be able to select which nominated authoriser receives the SMS code for that payment.

    We’ll share another update as soon as this is available.

    David Whitehouse supported this idea  · 
  2. 78 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi everyone, thanks for your continued feedback. To be upfront, we do not have any planned work to change how non-reportable allowances are processed at this stage. Currently, you need to use a reimbursement pay item to process these allowances. Our product team has confirmed that this remains a compliant solution with the ATO.

    However, we hear you. We know that relying on reimbursements involves workflow challenges. While it's not on our immediate roadmap, we will continue to monitor your feedback and will update this thread if anything changes.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Whitehouse commented  · 

    If an Allowance Type MUST be reported on STP it doesn't make sense that the item in the payroll item setup allows you to untick the "Reportable as W1 on Activity Statement" .

    This creates contradictory reporting between the BAS report and the STP submission.

    The attached reports (BAS and STP) show a $2,806.00 discrepancy because an STP mandatory TYPE of allowance had "Reportable as W1 on Activity Statement" unticked

    David Whitehouse supported this idea  · 
  3. 134 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Heya team, thanks for all your input here. We hear you, and understand that being able to assign multiple tracking categories to pay items would improve your reporting capabilities, and simplify tracking costs for various projects, locations, or departments.

    For now, we’d suggest using manual journals to split and reallocate payroll costs after a pay run. Alternatively as some have shared, you could create specific pay items for each tracking category combination, although we recognise this may not be suitable for all.

    While this isn’t in our plans at this stage we understand the rationale here and will consider how tracking works within payroll closely as we continue to develop our roadmap.

    If there are any changes or news for tracking in payroll we’ll be sure to update you of this here.

    David Whitehouse supported this idea  ·