Skip to content

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. 24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi team, while this idea has been around for sometime we appreciate for those that work with Checks this is an important feature and more customisation of checks would be greatly useful.

    To be upfront, this isn't something we have direct plans of right now but will continue to keep a pulse on the interest here and share if there are any updates.

    In the meantime, please do make sure to share this with any colleagues or clients that could benefit so they can add their support here.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Troy Horstman commented  · 

    It is really ridiculous that something as vitally important as the ability to print a check with the recipient's name above their address so that the post office can deliver it, has not been corrected in Xero. This is such a simple fix!
    All you have to do is add an additional payee's name field which can be checked and added when customizing your checks.

    With Quickbooks turning on all of their Desktop customers that they've had for the last 20+ years and locking them out of their books, you would think Xero would cease the opportunity the inherit all of those millions of customers. To do so however, the simplest things like being able to print a check with someone's name above their address would need to work properly!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Troy Horstman commented  · 

    This is REALLY annoying!!!

    I don't know why Xero would be the only software in the world that I've ever heard of that doesn't offer an option to have the person's name above the address.

    This means that we cannot use our window envelopes to mail any of our checks. Who ever heard of that??????????????

    This would be such a SIMPLE thing to fix. Just add the field as an option, PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Troy Horstman supported this idea  ·