Settings and activity
24 results found
-
9 votes
Melanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesMelanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesMelanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMelanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
197 votesMelanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesMelanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
8 votes
Great to hear you're expanded thinking on the Groups here, Melanie.
It'd be good to get a sense of interest in each separately.
I've slightly changed the title of your idea here and welcome to add others for the other ideas you think of around this. 🙂
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
commented
Another idea for the group profile.
We have an abundance of deregistered clients/entities in our client list. We would like the option of archiving these clients, but if they are still linked through the group, then they still show up under the group profile - but maybe in a separate section, so the group profile could list current clients and archived clients. Would this be possible?
Ideally, we want to archive them because they aren't an existing client anymore, however, we would still like them to be visible/searchable with the client data, so we can see their historical entities and for other reasons.
Melanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
73 votes
Thanks for your engagement and feedback through the idea here, community. Appreciate the examples provided of the needs in being able to add relationship types to your clients. While this is an idea our team have their eyes on, we want to be upfront that it's not something we have planned atm. We'll keep you informed if there's any progress to share on this, here.
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
commented
Is it possible to get an update on this? We have an abundance of unnecessary DNAF (do not act for) clients in our system, that we don't really want, just because we have to list them somewhere / link to structure charts. Being able to manually add these into relationships, would save so much time and hassle, both in acct and admin time, and also in reporting!
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
commented
I would also like to add a function to this!
It would be good to manually write external parties (non-client), and there associated dates, number of shares, notes, etc, so that we don't have to add them to XPM as a client and list as Do Not Act For (as it makes the group and client list messy). The aim would be that the non-clients can still link through to structure charts, etc.
Would also be good to have the non-clients (manual entries) shown in a different colour (or just black as wont be linked), so that it is easy to tell which are clients v non-clients.
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
commented
Agree with this! Would like to show clients are siblings, etc, so people don't get confused about the relationships.
Would also like to have an option called Bare Trust.
Melanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMelanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesMelanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
13 votesMelanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesMelanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesMelanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
commented
Agree with this! Would be very helpful to have a 12 month option.
Melanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesMelanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
commented
Hi Maneesha, although that is an option, we were hoping for a rule approach to potentially be introduced to keep it in the system and feel more confident with the accuracy of the changes. Thanks for the input though :)
Melanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
32 votesMelanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesMelanie McPhillips
shared this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Melanie McPhillips
commented
I agree with this! It would certainly make it easier to archive the group rather than delete the group, as that way when you are looking for a client at a later date (whether it be they return or for other reasons), you still have easy access to the entities in their group.
Melanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
-
149 votes
Hi community, thanks for all your inputs and support in this idea so far.
💡Our product team have a keen interest to understand more around the purpose this field would have to each of your business.
If you can a share any detail through your feedback to this idea this will be valuable to the teams discovery. Thanks and we'll keep you updated here.
Melanie McPhillips
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
Would be great if there was a field auto-generated for profile creation and archived. Could run reports on new and lost entities/profiles.