Settings and activity
67 results found
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elisa Harris
commented
Very important, especially for firms that have recently come across to XPM from other software and are facing a mammoth clean up task that must be done manually!
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elisa Harris
commented
Super important to be able to access larger reports of all staff, not just charge out rates but other info like permission settings would be helpful too. This is especially important for larger firms like ours with over 50 staff. It is impractical to be expected to complete these tasks individually and manually.
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesElisa Harris
shared this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elisa Harris
commented
100% agree, the financial permissions need to be reassessed and possibly split out. While for some staff I need them to be able to view other staff members' timesheets for ease of billings & WIP analysis, I don't want to provide them the other permissions included in the Financial Permissions.
Rosalie is right, this permission must be of necessity quite closely restricted due to the broad powers associated with providing it to a staff member.
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elisa Harris
commented
This is very important, as it cuts down on a significant amount of time when analysing WIP, to be able to view other staff members' timesheets on a job. Kaye is right, this permission is of necessity quite closely restricted due to the broad powers associated with providing it to a staff member.
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elisa Harris
commented
Absolutely! We also came from Handi and that was one function I used all the time.
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Thanks for starting the idea here, Renee.
Just to clarify, when you say ‘duplicate a contact’ would this be; the ability to duplicate an entire client (including all its contacts), to duplicate a contact within an existing client, or duplicate a contact from one client to another?
If the last, we have a similar idea over here that I can join you in with. 🙂An error occurred while saving the comment Elisa Harris
commented
Absolutely! So many clients share the same exact details - seems a bit unnecessary to have to type the exact same thing multiple times when adding a group of clients. Not to mention the margin for error...
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
214 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Hi everyone, coming back across the idea here we wanted to clarify existing behaviour.
When you remove a staff member from HQ this automatically removes all org access, as long as those orgs are linked to client records, and as long as the client records are active (not archived) - Meaning you don't need to manually remove access to each org one by one.
The few cases where you would need to manually remove one by one would be if a client is archived or an org is not linked to a client record at the time of staff removal.
We intend to improve this experience and provide better visibility of staff access in the longer term, so when there is more progress on this I'll return to update you here.
Elisa Harris
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesElisa Harris
supported this idea
·
100% agree - big waste of time to do everything one by one.