Settings and activity
3 results found
-
202 votes
Hi everyone, we appreciate the feedback we've received on this change and while this was an intentional change this is something our product teams are monitoring feedback of very closely and considering improvements around in the new clients experience.
While we can't make any commitments atm I will be certain to share any plans with you all here.
Ravinder Malhan
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
190 votes
We appreciate users wanting more flexibility in the data they show on invoices. At present our teams are re-developing some of the base features across Sales with particular focus on new invoicing.
At this time, there are no plans for developing a fields for a PO number in invoicing. Focus is on existing features in invoicing.
It's good to get a renewed understanding of interest here on Product Ideas, and if there's any news we will update on this here.In the meantime, there is a way the custom template can be edited to rename the Reference field as a 'Purchase Order Number' field - see more in the discussion here.
An error occurred while saving the comment Ravinder Malhan
commented
Please look into this otherwise other software will take over the accounting work Thanks
Ravinder Malhan
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ravinder Malhan
commented
Its very Important
Ravinder Malhan
supported this idea
·
It is disappointing that this change has been implemented. We manage large client groups, often with ten or more entities, and are now required to update each entity manually. This creates unnecessary inefficiency and adds significant administrative time. It is unclear why Xero is making XPM more difficult to use rather than improving overall usability. This feature should be reviewed and corrected as a matter of priority, with proper consideration given to feedback from active users.
Additionally, it is unclear why a country must be selected first when saving an address in XPM. The previous version worked extremely well. A single address input section would be far more efficient, with the option to designate the address as residential, postal, or both within XPM.