This is a backward step! It seems you are removing accountants plans and replacing them with end user plans at higher cost - we do not use the same features at all!! I can't think of any of our clients who would use cash coding, most don't use rules at all - wheres accountants always use cash coding for both semi-automating rules and also for bulk reconciliation.
If you must remove an accountants plans then we need to see Cash Coding reinstated for Ignite - it is after all the only package inner range without it - even Ledger has bulk reconciliation!!!
Why not simply re-instate VAT Cashbook which perfectly fitted that bookkeeper and accountant need for non-accrual accounting and bookkeeping use?
Tim Woodward
supported this idea
·
This is a backward step! It seems you are removing accountants plans and replacing them with end user plans at higher cost - we do not use the same features at all!! I can't think of any of our clients who would use cash coding, most don't use rules at all - wheres accountants always use cash coding for both semi-automating rules and also for bulk reconciliation.
If you must remove an accountants plans then we need to see Cash Coding reinstated for Ignite - it is after all the only package inner range without it - even Ledger has bulk reconciliation!!!
Why not simply re-instate VAT Cashbook which perfectly fitted that bookkeeper and accountant need for non-accrual accounting and bookkeeping use?