Skip to content

Settings and activity

6 results found

  1. 75 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi community, we'd like to confirm that enabling phone numbers to be stored against additional people within a contact record is not something we have plans to develop at this time. This may be a function we look to explore in the long-term so we're still interested to get a clearer understanding of users that'd like to see this developed, and will continue to track this through the conversation here. If there's any change we will let you know on on this idea.

    Rowan GAT Goss supported this idea  · 
  2. 102 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rowan GAT Goss supported this idea  · 
  3. 69 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Moving along with the project, our team are now in the process of developing a new send modal that'll enable you to cc and Bcc when using the new invoicing experience. 😊

    We're not too far off with this work and I'll continue to keep you updated on news for this, here! 

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rowan GAT Goss commented  · 

    Thinking about this more, for me, it is enough to add multiple emails, as TO, but I can see that others may place more importance on the subtle difference between the 3 classifications of recipients. I think over-automating things can also have a downside, if you want to BCC an invoice just send it yourself from Xero and then forward it to whoever from your own email client. Surely that's part of the job.

    Rowan GAT Goss supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rowan GAT Goss commented  · 

    "Only need the BOM..."
    sounds simple but it is the thin edge of the wedge, or it opens the door to greater complexity than the current scope of Xero. You know it never stops there, get a BOM and then you will want .... It's crossing a line... I think I've run out of metaphors, but you get the idea.
    Still, it's a good idea.

  5. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rowan GAT Goss supported this idea  · 
  6. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rowan GAT Goss commented  · 

    I agree that this should be fixed. It seems to be either an oversight or poor development (in contrast with the rest of the app)

    Rowan GAT Goss supported this idea  ·