Skip to content

Settings and activity

6 results found

  1. 167 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Kelly He supported this idea  · 
  2. 220 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi team, while we don't have immediate plans to change the placement of buttons on new invoicing we're interested in staying close to this feedback and I'll move the idea to Under review for the time being. We'll return to confirm any outcomes. 

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kelly He commented  · 

    Agree - the flow of the classic version makes more senses. You review all your line items and at the end you Save or Approve your invoice. Going all the way back to the top to Approve an invoice it's not practical when you have 50-60 lines on your invoice. Or at least, the top panel where the Approve button is should be freeze, then we don't need to move all the way back up.

    Also, can we just have the "Approve" button like in the classic version. This is more useful than the "Approve and email" button.

    Kelly He supported this idea  · 
  3. 370 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kelly He commented  · 

    Agree - possibly it might be useful for some others but definitely not me. Why would you save a change to the invoice when you have not reviewed it yet. This action should initiated by the user not the system.

    Kelly He supported this idea  · 
  4. 424 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks to everyone that participated in and shared back on the team’s research in the new invoicing layout. Taking your feedback on board our teams have made some improvements to the layout of new invoicing, including changes to the layout of fields and buttons.
    By rearranging and condensing space between fields, you’ll find there is less white space than previously shown, making it easier to navigate and tab through fields when entering your invoices.

    We’re actively looking into changes within the invoicing grid that’ll go further to condensing information on the screen and reducing actions when entering your invoices. We’ll update as there is more information to share on this.

    Kelly He supported this idea  · 
  5. 834 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi community, we value there are many different aspects within new invoicing where our invoicing users can see small changes to flows and actions could make a big difference to your workflow and experience.

    I can assure you we’re engaged, we’re listening and we’re taking all your feedback into consideration as we keep building on new invoicing.

    While we’ll continue to keep you updated on specific releases that relate to things that’ve been mentioned in this idea, our teams have also begun some research to get a deepened sense of our invoicing users for future improvements. We’d like to connect with you all in this idea, and invite you to share further feedback through our survey. Your insights will be invaluable to the team as they continue to plan and prioritise in this space.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kelly He commented  · 

    Totally agree - the classic version is much better and faster than the new version in terms of all functionality.
    Tried the new invoicing version, it took so long for it to load even with a couple of line items. Tried every month but see no improvement in this area. This is so inefficient and time wasting when you have so many invoices to raise each day.
    Also, in the editing screen, you can't even see the full name of the GL Account, only the first 17 characters are showing. I even tried to zoom out of my browser, it still doesn't work. It's not user-friendly at all if you have to click on each GL code to review their full name for each line when you have 40-50 lines to review on the invoice. You also need to scroll horizontally to view all the invoice fields - again not user-friendly at all.
    Besides that, the new auto-save function added maybe it's useful for some users. But, it would be great if we can choose to use that function or not. I'd prefer to make the changes and review the changes before clicking Save as draft.
    I really hope the the classic version can stay. Or at least it should be extended to the point where all these issues have been resolved before you roll-out the new invoicing function. It's definitely worth for the product team to sit down and actually test out on the functions before they launch it.

    Kelly He supported this idea  · 
  6. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Olga, really appreciate all the detail in your steps and the screenshots you provided.

    I tried testing this myself with a Chrome browser and did get the same errors and behaviour you described, so have raised this with our product team. I'll keep you updated of any information I get back from them on this, here.

    Kelly He supported this idea  ·