Settings and activity
4 results found
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Zhaklina Andoni
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesZhaklina Andoni
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Hi community, we appreciate your support and sharing here and want to apologise we haven't responded on this idea before now.
We understand there are opportunities to improve the demo company and provide customers with more flexibility and simplicity in being able to test more thoroughly using the setup and structure of their own organisation, rather than needing to recreate this manually in a separate environment.
This is an area we can see value in evolving, and although this specific capability isn't currently on the roadmap, it's been noted and will remain part of future product planning conversations.
We'll make sure to share any news around this with you all, here.
Zhaklina Andoni
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesZhaklina Andoni
supported this idea
·
This is really important. Especially since the only way to cross check if the deferal is landing correctly per month is to use Excel. However with rounding errors and the exact calculation being used can create a difference which means that the manual journal could be incorrect. Even if the variance is off by cents, it is still important when completing year end reconciliation and closes and effects how many correcting entries need to be made that are only a few cents.