Settings and activity
3 results found
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Barbara Light
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
✨ Thanks for the thoughtful feedback on the check printing order. We understand that when checks print in an unpredictable sequence, it makes it harder to match with backup documentation and to reissue in a consistent order if needed. We’re tracking requests here for the ability to sort (for example, by payee) and to keep the order predictable and repeatable across print runs. This idea is open for community support (Gaining Support)so others can add votes and any details to help us gauge impact.
Barbara Light
supported this idea
·
-
249 votes
Hi community, we appreciate this idea has collected a fair amount of interest which has all been shared with and reviewed by the product team.
While this isn't currently being worked on there are other ideas this team are working on right now, including a bulk void feature and highlighting rows when selected. Although these features are still under development process and we don't have confirmed release dates yet.
With regards to having a separate field for the posting date and invoice date, our team is interested in better understanding this idea as it may be something they look to develop down the track. They really appreciate and encourage you to continue to share your experiences, pain points and insights. This will help them understand how this feature can benefit you and other customers, as well as gauge demand for it.
As always, if there's any change we will…
Barbara Light
supported this idea
·
I have some suppliers that may have 25 invoices to be paid, and each invoice might have 20 lines. Or I may have one bill for $5,000 that gets allocated to 15 accounts. That is not efficient to have on the check stub. It is useless information for the supplier to see how we allocate expenses in our system.
The check stub should be a listing of the supplier invoice # and not our internal records.