Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We appreciate you raised this a little while ago, thank you for your patience whilst we review. Whilst this isn't currently on our product team's road map, they've reviewed your comments and can see the value scheduling superannuation payments would bring. With this in mind, we've moved the status of this idea to Accepted and will keep you updated as we go.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sharyn Keron commented  · 

    I came here to see if this had been suggested. We have started doing same day super payments already, but if I am running a pay run early like now for the xmas 28.12 FE pay run, I don't want our super to pay until the actual wages payment date preferably. So now I need to log back in especially to pay the super on the 29, 30 or 31.12. Also some months the pay FE date and actual pay date will roll into a new month. I would like both the payroll and super that belong together to stay in the same month. So if my pays are processed on a Mon say 31st of a month and then I load the super after completing the payrun, the Super will go through on the 31st, but the pays will actually debit to the bank on 2nd of the month on the Wednesday when actually paid. So the two will be in different months on the books. So when loading the super on the Monday it would be nice to be able to select the Wednesday 2nd for the super payment to be processed.

    Sharyn Keron supported this idea  · 
  2. 257 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hey everyone, we appreciate a lot of recent activity and trend in this idea especially with Pay Day Super coming.

    As mentioned in my last updated this is an idea our product teams are keeping a close pulse on and we want you to know this is high on our agenda, likely to be picked up later this year.

    While we can't provide any commitments as yet, we'll share another update here as soon as there's progress.

    Sharyn Keron supported this idea  · 
  3. 50 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi community, thank you for sharing how valuable this feature could be for your workflows and we can see the benefit this would have for businesses that have regular recurring trade with suppliers.

    While this is something we'll keep front of mind as the teams plan their roadmaps we want to be honest that this isn't on the roadmap right now.

    If there is any wind of plans for this we'll let you all know here.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sharyn Keron commented  · 

    Hi Laura I use the RECURRING PURCHASE invoice option for standard monthly or recurring bills received such as Synergy, Telstra, Water, Cleaning etc. Anything that routinely comes in and set it to the same bill date roughly each month. Then it sits in your DRAFT PURCHASES awaiting processing. So you can check you outstanding DRAFT invoices list each month before closing off (or any time) to see if anything you should have received has not been processed yet. This works as a good cross check for me.

    I requested the RECURRING PO for Suppliers we actually have to send a Purchase Order to, predominantly CLOTHING ORDERS for us, which often use the same ITEMS and also Staff Amenities that we stock up on routinely like tea, coffee, milk etc. Obviously not a big ticket item as no action on this in a few years. Doesn't sound like a hard option to offer??

    Sharyn Keron shared this idea  ·