Settings and activity
1210 results found
-
10 votes
Thanks for sharing your idea, and letting us know the changes that matter most for you.
We've reviewed your idea and have updated the status to Gaining Support. It's now up to the community to get behind and support it.
Along with votes, other members can now comment to share additional detail about how your idea could improve their experience with Xero.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Appreciate the feedback on the little things that would improve your experience when working with Fixed Assets. I've shared this back with our product team. We don't have any immediate plans but we'll track the interest and share if there's any change planned.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Thanks so much for taking the time to share this idea with us.
This is something we’ve heard interest in from other customers as well, so we’re moving it into the Gaining support stage. From here, other users can add their votes and comments, which helps show how many people would find this useful and the different ways it would help them.
Our product team regularly reviews ideas in this stage alongside other work. While we can’t promise if or when this will be developed, the level of support and detail shared here is an important input into future planning.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
106 votes
Hi everyone, thanks for the engagement in this idea overtime. Being transparent, we don't have any plans for enabling the ability to work across multiple organisations at a time.
Allowing multiple organisations to be open in one browser session creates risk of entering data for one organisation in another that'd create a permanent audit trail in the wrong place.
However, as shared by some here there are workarounds;
- You can use separate web browsers or incognito windows for each organisation, or
- Create multiple profiles within a browser like Chrome.
Both these options provide safer process for accessing different organisations at once.
If we make any plans to revisit this in the future we'll update this idea to share with you all here.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
The workaround I use for this is to open each entity in a different browser. Unfortunately, there aren't enough browsers installed by IT on my computer to open all the inter-related entities at the same time, but I can at least get one open in Chrome and one open in Firefox!
-
28 votes
Hi everyone,
Thanks so much for taking the time to share your feedback and explain how this would improve your experience with Global Search.
We’ve reviewed this idea and are moving it to Gaining Support so we can continue building a clearer picture of how valuable this would be for customers.
The suggestions and examples shared here have absolutely been noted. They help highlight where the current search experience can feel limiting, and they give our team useful context about the types of improvements customers would most like to see. The feedback shared so far is thoughtful, constructive, and well worth capturing.
If this idea would help you, please keep voting and add any comments or examples of how you’d like this to work in practice. Real examples of what you’re searching for, what results you expect, and where the current experience falls short are especially helpful as we continue…
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
Here's a screenshot of a search I did within a client's accounts today. I was trying to open the contact, and no matter how much of the contact's name I entered, it wouldn't give me the contact (only bills and transactions), and then after I had entered a significant portion of the contact's name, it refused to give me any results at all. So I opened up one of those bills so I could show you just how ridiculous it is.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
Today I was searching for a particular search term ("ACT Payroll Tax" except all lower case because it won't let me enter capitals), and you can see the result in my screenshot. I am in a contact, with the exact search terms listed as the first three words of the reference of every transaction in that contact. But not a single one shows up as a result of the search, nor does a different contact whose name includes those three words in the name ("ACT Revenue Office - Payroll Tax").
This is very suboptimal.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
I say that about entering a space after the exact term because I believe that enabling part-matches as an option when exact matches cannot be found would mean that the exact matches that currently cannot be found for whatever reason will come under the category of part-matches and will be found.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
I often find that the only way to get the Contact I'm looking for - even if I know the exact name - is to add a space on the end. You can see in the attached screenshots from multiple different clients that searching couldn't find the Contact, only the bills, and while I can get to the Contact via the bills, I'd much rather click straight to the Contact that was the reason I'm searching.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Thanks for raising this, please do look out for the sharks! Atm, Xero Tax pulls the information at the date the filing is created so providing they're directors at that date, they should be included in the company information we receive back.
This'll include all active directors, whether they're appointed in the year of afterwards.
However, we're planning to improve this to offer more flexibility around the Directors information, including improving the format of the names themselves. We'll be in touch when we have more detail to share.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
124 votes
Hi everyone, we appreciate you taking the time to share how important more flexible payroll permissions are for your teams.
It's clear that having granular control over who can access different parts of payroll would make a real difference to how you manage timesheets and leave approvals, as well as restrict access to other sensitive areas.
From research, Payroll is definitely an area we know needs more permission controls for varying roles. This is something our product teams are beginning to explore and do deeper research of. We'll keep you updated as we make progress, and we're grateful for your continued input.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
I REALLY don't need to be sent copies of all the timesheets for approval for all my clients, particularly since I can't attest to the employee's timeliness since I'm not there, I'm an offsite advisor.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
Here's another screenshot, because September is over and I'd like to reconcile the PAYG withheld for September against the PAYG paid NOW rather than when I prepare the September BAS which is due in eight weeks time. And I'd really rather have a total I can compare to the total on the Payroll Employee Summary or other reports instead of relying on my ability to not make typos when adding up each prepayment individually.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
As it is, this is what the 'outstanding bills' to the ATO currently looks like for that client... not in credit but a whole bunch of prepayments.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
I have an Australian client who is a medium withholder for PAYG. I'd really like to be able to see a total for the amount that has been paid after every payrun, as is required for medium withholders, so that I can reconcile this with the amount that will show on the Activity Statement (since Xero doesn't have an option for reports to be generated any more frequently than monthly) and plan for the cash flow required to pay the GST component.
-
34 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Thank you for sharing your feedback and voting on the idea here, community. While we've reviewed this idea and appreciate the needs in what you're wanting here, we want to be open that we don't have any plans for developing a billable expenses report of this nature in the near term.
We will continue to track the interest here, and share if anything changes.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Thanks for feeding back to us here, Mark. I want to assure you our product teams and leadership are very attentive to the feedback we've been receiving from customers on the new invoicing experience and we're committed to improving this.
It helps for each of the points you've raised to be tracked separately so our teams can consider the votes as a factor when prioritising and planning development, as well as keeping the communication clear of the changes we're making.
Many of the things you've shared are being worked on and we have separate ideas for these that I've listed below and welcome you to join and vote for each, if you'd like.
Trying to get a better view of the placement of buttons that you mentioned - would this just be the Attach files option or is there another that you would like to see shifted above, too?
- New…
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
A workaround that a friend recently put me onto is using multiple profiles in Chrome - I can have one separate instance of Xero open in each profile, each logged into separately
https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2364824?hl=en&co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop