Skip to content

Settings and activity

112 results found

  1. 99 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    Totally agree, coming from a firm that transitioned from Handi 18 months ago, it is less than ideal for all staff to be able to view all these personal details for staff and their families/entities such as:
    - Home address
    - Dates of birth
    - How many and which entities the staff member has

    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    Absolutely, yes yes please! This is a HUGE issue and has a major impact on procedures, that the average staff member cannot view data like this because to grant them that permission is far too broad. Especially seeing the biller client for the group is essential and extremely disappointing that you have to have full financial permissions to be able to view such minor/non-sensitive information.

    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    Absolutely, it would be so helpful to have some sort of automatic input or matching, to eliminate people entering one and forgetting to do so for the other.

    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  6. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    Absolutely critical! Can't believe this isn't a thing yet! Definitely need to be able to bulk delete jobs, especially because you can bulk add them and there is therefore a much higher likelihood something goes wrong or get imported incorrectly.

    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  9. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  10. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    Great idea! But you would need to have the option so that people aren't receiving emails they don't want! (eg it's a newer manager so the partner is still reviewing all invoices that go out in the interim. In this case they need the option to be able to turn this off)

    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    Yes! When we first onboarded with Xero our implementation consultant advised that you would be able to choose which you wanted to bill under, if there was a billing entity assigned. We very quickly discovered this is not the case! I can't tell you how many times I have drafted an invoice only to discover it is under a different entity because I didn't know there was a billing entity already set up. Having to then delete the draft and reraise it is inefficient to say the least!

    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    100%. It wastes a lot of time when you think you entered it but now can't find it and have to go scrolling through every timesheet entry (which could be dozens in a day) to confirm if it has been entered. Double entering the same entry is therefore quite common unfortunately.

    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  13. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  15. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    I have been saying for a long time that the Financial Permissions need to be updated. There are a vast number of functions which are restricted in 'Financial Permissions,' and yet to provide this permission opens up a broad range of access that the average staff member shouldn't have. Help please!

  16. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  17. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  18. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  19. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Elisa Harris supported this idea  · 
  20. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Elisa Harris commented  · 

    I disagree, we need this option to archive a job with WIP still on it, to keep staff from accidentally posting to a job/task that is complete but not yet billed.