Skip to content

Settings and activity

7 results found

  1. 48 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shelley Roche commented  · 

    It would be great if you could also re-allocate invoiced amounts to a different job i.e. wanting to consolidate invoiced amounts into one job if wrong reference used or things change

    Shelley Roche supported this idea  · 
  2. 181 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi everyone, thanks for sharing the different types of relationships you'd like to be able to track in Practice Manager.

    While we're making a lot of improvements to Clients with the new unified experience, we want to be upfront that developing more custom relationships like you're after here isn't on our roadmap.

    We'll continue to monitor and track the interest of this idea for future planning, and if there's any change to the status of this one, we'll let you know here.

    Shelley Roche supported this idea  · 
  3. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Shelley Roche shared this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Shelley Roche supported this idea  · 
  5. 164 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for the continued support of this idea, and providing added detail on why seeing age at a glance would be helpful in your workflows.

    We've looked into possible solutions to accommodate the needs here, however there's some work that'd need to be done to achieve this. With current focus on Xero Partner Hub release this isn't a feature that we've planned at this time. However, we'll continue to reassess and consider this in future planning. I'll share if there are any updates.


    Shelley Roche supported this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shelley Roche commented  · 

    It would be great if the job number reference on the Xero invoice was able to overrule the client name when it flows into XPM. For example on a recurring invoice you can add a job reference and have more than one recurring invoice per job. These may be issued to more than one entity within the group but all flow into the one job.

    Alternatively if you could create a job for a Group and then have the invoices flow into XPM and if the job # matches and the client name matches an entity within the group it all goes against that job correctly.

    Check out case #CX0014141010 for more info if needed

    Shelley Roche supported this idea  · 
  7. 116 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi team, back to share an update as work progresses. 😊

    Our team are in active development of 2025 (and future years) tax returns to provide pre-population of loss balances bought forward. We'll also provide warning on the return where data differs from that received from IR.

    I'll loop back again as we roll this out, along with further details of the change. Thanks!

    Shelley Roche supported this idea  ·