Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Peter Bateman supported this idea  · 
  2. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Bateman commented  · 

    Xero have to make this change. It is pure common sense. If this is not the most logical change idea in relation to XPM I'd be surprised.

    It has always baffled me why XPM (and other software) run task budgets on time when time is relative to staff charge out rates (which can vary across the type and experience of staff).

    If I have a $1000 budget and my charge out is $250 then I have 4 hours in the budget. But if I charge out at $200 I have 5 hours. If I have staff with different charge out rates this will change again based on how much each staff inputs.

    A time based budget will only ever be correct if all staff are on the same charge out rate which is anything but common in a modern accounting firm.

    Xero - we don't charge clients their time, we charge them their $$$. Make this fix a priority.

    Peter Bateman supported this idea  · 
  3. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Appreciate your input here, everyone. Our team has looked into this idea to better understand the needs and complexities involved, however they don't have any concrete plans for it just yet.

    Rest assured that our eyes are on the ground monitoring your feedback and votes here, so please keep adding them in this thread. For the time being, I’ll move this idea into ‘Under review’ status. And if there's any movement, we'll make sure to come back here and let you all know.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Bateman commented  · 

    Yes... add this please.

    Peter Bateman supported this idea  ·