Settings and activity
1280 results found
-
12 votes
Thanks for the added detail, Becky. This is good to know when sharing back with the team. While this may be something we look closer at down the line, I want to be open that we don't have direct change planned in the near term.
Understand it's a few more clicks at present, potentially to save tabbing 8 time clicking on the Tax Rate column and then tabbing once may save a little time atm. Completely get it's not a resolve though.
Account Team - Is it possible that this would be when you're copying an invoice to a new draft invoice? If so, and you select the same Contact defaults aren't automatically applied and you'd need to remove and re-add the contact on the new draft invoice to trigger defaults to be applied. Otherwise, I'd recommend raising a case with our team of specialists for a closer look as…
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
372 votes
Hey everyone👋 Thanks so much for sharing all your feedback and keeping the conversation going here. We've been following along and considering changes around the process for adding payments in new invoicing.
As we mentioned in our last update, while we won’t be bringing classic invoicing back, we're taking a close look at what made it work so well for you. The ability to quickly enter payment information without leaving the invoice is a key part of that.
To address this, our product team is now working to reintroduce this functionality to the invoice page.
We can’t share a timeline just yet, but we want you to know that your comments have been a vital part of this process. We’ll be sure to post an update here as soon as we have more to share.🙂
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
@Lusiana Kisnanto having to click instead of being able to use the keyboard is a breach of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) international standards. Specifically success criterion 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception).
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
398 votes
Hey team, thanks for all your input on partial asset disposal.
We understand that manually managing parts of an asset can be time-consuming. While we don't have plans at this time to develop a built-in feature, your feedback's really helpful in showing us where things could improve.
For now, manual methods to calculate depreciation and record journal entries to keep things accurate would be the best option.
However, this is a feature that we'd like to revisit as we plan our future roadmaps, and will be happy to share if there is any traction around this. Please keep sharing this idea with any colleagues you feel could benefit from this too.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
Hi team. We can see it's been a while since we've provided you with an update about this idea. Looks like it's steadily Gaining Support.
Whilst this idea isn't currently on our product team's roadmap, we're monitoring the activity and will keep you updated as we go.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Appreciate sharing your thoughts on date conventions used across reports in Xero, Danmark. While there's standardisation across the way dates are shown across Xero, there can be slight differences based on region, as well as the period being reflected.
For example all regions excepting US will show date format as Date Month Year, where-as US will be formatted as Month Day, Year.
When Xero reports for a general period like an entire month or year this is abbreviated to the shortest date format that represents that period e.g June 2025 or 2025 respectively, however when running a report for a singular 'as at' date the entire date is shown such as 13 June 2025.
While I appreciate it doesn't mean a change to the formatting that you're requesting here, hopefully this sheds light on where date formatting may differ and gives more assurance that there's a structured approach to how…
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Thanks for sharing your idea, and letting us know the changes that matter most for you.
We've reviewed your idea and now it's up to the community to get behind and support it.
Along with votes, other members can now comment to share additional detail about how your idea could improve their experience with Xero.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
Especially since Xero isn't set up to allow large PAYG withholders, only monthly and quarterly reporters.
For Xero's reference, here's the Australian Tax Office information on withholding cycles: https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/hiring-and-paying-your-workers/payg-withholding/paying-and-reporting-withheld-amounts/when-to-pay-and-report-on-activity-statements
Large PAYG Withholders are those who are, or have in the recent past, withholding more than 1 million per year in tax, which works out to a bit over $83k withheld per month. Which is easy to do in industries with a bunch of high income earners, like IT - it takes fewer than 20 employees in the top tax bracket.
-
36 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Thanks for your patience, it’s been a little while since you raised this idea, so we wanted to check in. We've now reviewed this idea and have moved it to Gaining Support status. Our product team are keeping an eye on this idea and we will continue to share updates as things evolve.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
Hi everyone, appreciate raising this with us.
Our product team has confirmed that these records are not deleted when an organisation is deleted, but they're moved into a hidden state. We're looking into how we can improve the storing of these within Xero HQ in future. If you need help with this in the meantime please contact our Xero support team via Xero Central.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
Don't we need to keep certain records for a minimum of 5 or 7 years (or possibly more) depending on the country? Removing our access to these records means we may be in breach of our legal responsibilities through no fault of our own.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
118 votes
Hi everyone, thanks for getting behind this idea and sharing the need for employees to add multiple earnings rates to Start and End timesheets.
Your examples demonstrate how different earnings rates in a single timesheet would save time and improve payroll accuracy for industries with varied awards.
We understand many of you are currently editing timesheets after employees submit them, which adds extra steps.
The good news is that idea is now in discovery. Our product team is currently reviewing the viability of this idea and exploring what a solution could look like.
We will post an update here as soon as we have more news.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
@Kelly Munro, I'd like to note that for those with Accessibility needs, clicking may not be an option at all, and tabbing x8 is the only available method