Settings and activity
1299 results found
-
10 votes
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
123 votes
Hi everyone, thanks for sharing your thoughts on having a payroll report that calculates payroll state tax. We understand some of you are required to calculate tax across multiple states.
While we don't currently have a report which calculates earnings based on state, some of you have mentioned workarounds such as using the Payroll Activity Summary report. This report includes earnings totals and can be filtered by a date range and employee groups.
We recognise the value a report of this nature could have for our customers and it’s been added to the wider pool of ideas for our product team to consider for future development.
While it’s not on our immediate roadmap, we’ll be sure to keep you looped in if there’s any progress.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
Yeah - the big problem for me with my own workaround is that we can only have two active tracking categories, so if I use one for payroll tax then I only have one for everything else. I'd rather have a report.
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
We get around this by manually assigning a tracking category to each employee, but that is subject to user error. An automatic report based on postcode would be easier (some of us would still have to adjust it for cross-border employees, like those that live in nearby NSW but work in Canberra, but it would give us a starting point).
-
156 votes
Hi everyone, thanks for your feedback on adding allowances and other unit types to timesheets. We appreciate you sharing how important this is for managing your payroll.
We’ve reviewed this idea and we certainly see the benefits it would deliver, so we're updating this idea to Accepted.
While it’s not currently on our roadmap, we'll let you know right here if there are any developments on this. Thanks for your continued engagement.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
As it stands, in order to do this correctly, the same entity has to have two Xero instances, one for each country, which is dumb.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
87 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
We do this manually with a repeating draft bill set up to ensure we don't forget that the liability needs to be paid; it would be AMAZING to not have to manually do this every BAS and IAS.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
This is one of the reasons I refuse to use the new BAS option - I and my clients are still using the old activity statement because checking that changes or mistakes from previous periods are taken up within the time span that the ATO allows is kind of important.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Is there a specific report or reports that you're comparing transactions with, Fiona?
With the Payable and Receivables Invoice Summary and Detail reports there are options to show (ex) and (inc) in different columns, we also provide options to show Net, GST and Gross amounts separately.
Freya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Freya Pieroz
commented
This is the autogenerated reports that you get in the dropdown at the bottom of each payrun, yes? (not the version via the reports page in which you can customise the dates covered)
-
28 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
83 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
64 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesFreya Pieroz
supported this idea
·
This would be amazing. Being able to designate which employee belongs to which state for the month (instead of having to use one of the two tracking categories) would also be amazing, especially for businesses in border towns like Canberra.
(if an employee lives 5 minutes across the border into NSW, but usually works in Canberra, then usually the employer would be counting them in their ACT payroll tax. But if they work one week of the month in Queensland, then that month they're not working exclusively in one state so you have to go to the tiered tests to see which state they count for, and the first of those tests is where the employee's permanent place of residence is, so for that month that the employee worked one week in Queensland and three weeks in Canberra, the employer gets to include them in their NSW payroll tax lodgement. Fun.)