Settings and activity
31 results found
-
144 votes
Hi everyone, thanks for all of your valuable feedback on this idea. The number of detailed comments clearly show how important this feature is for many of you.
We also agree that this would add significant value to Xero Expenses. That’s why we’re pleased to update the status of this idea to Accepted. This means we have reviewed your feedback and it aligns with our product vision.
While it is a feature we’d like to build, it’s not currently on our roadmap, so we can't provide a delivery timeframe just yet. We will share another update on this thread as soon as we have more news.
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
61 votes
Hi Tina, just thinking in lieu of this feature atm - To help get a view of bills that don't have an assigned planned date you can click the Planned date header to sort all bills by planned date and this will also group all bills with no planned date. 🙂
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Height
commented
Agree this would be useful to review bills that are not scheduled.
-
130 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Height
commented
Agree, this should be a feature that works alonside the planned date so that you can effectively blockout that bill so that it is not caught up in batch payments, and it shows in cash flow reports. Should also be option for bills paid by BPAY.
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesLisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
220 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Height
commented
This would be great! To be able to differentiate contacts that are paid by Batch payment (direct deposit), Bpay, or Direct Debit.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Height
commented
Absoluttely agree with this one. Should be able to mark a contact as a direct debit or Bpay payee which then would flag any bills under this contact, so that when viewing Bills to Pay you do not select them by mistake for a batch payment.
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesLisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
60 votesLisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Thanks for your patience whilst your idea is gaining traction.
We've reviewed your idea and can see that it's been gaining community support.
Whilst this idea isn't currently in the pipeline, we'll keep track of members votes and comments to gain insight about how your idea could improve users experience with Xero.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Height
commented
This needs to be setup in Xero so that for a casual employee you can set their base rate and the casual loading as two separate items for STP reporting, but then combine them to calculate overtime, so that the correct rate is paid and super obligations are correctly reported.
I have been advised by Xero that this facility is not available, so I am going to have to manually calculate rates/loadings for my employee each pay run. Thankfully I only have 1 casual at this point but surely there are others who have multiple casuals for whom this would be a major headache.
Has anyone else come up with a work around?
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
217 votes
Hey everyone, we thank you for the detailed feedback on improving how leave requests work for part-time employees in Australian payroll.
We understand the value of shifting the task of adjusting hours to employees, freeing up payroll administrators’ time for other priorities and we also appreciate the points raised around accuracy and compliance.
While we don’t have current plans to deliver exactly what’s been suggested here, our product team is continuing to focus on developing working patterns within AU Payroll. Based on what we’ve seen in other regions, this'll likely address many of the needs discussed here.
We’ll move this idea to Not in pipeline for now, but we’ll keep you posted on any updates that could help achieve what’s being asked.
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
1,436 votes
Hi everyone, we know this remains a highly important request, and we appreciate the volume of detail you’ve shared around billing, delivery and contact management workflows in this idea.
As shared in our last update - our team has been progressing the next phase of work needed to bring this more meaningfully into invoicing.
We know many of you are looking for clearer timing, and while I’m not able to confirm a release date at this stage, I do want to reassure you this remains an active area of work for our product teams.
We’ll continue to return here with further updates as we move through the next stages. Thanks again for your patience and for continuing to share the workflows that make this so important.
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
-
776 votes
Hi community, we appreciate your continued feedback on having different default email addresses for various transaction types in Xero contacts, and the manual steps involved to ensure you're communicating with the right person for different purposes.
Currently, one way of managing this in Xero would be to include every additional person on a contact record in emails, and then removing those that aren't required when sending each transaction. However we totally get this isn't the ideal solution.
While being able to set different email addresses for differing transaction types is something we want to address longer term, like the idea for multiple addresses work for this feature requires cross-collaboration between teams in order to achieve.
Once the multiple addresses feature is live this is something we'll be able to consider more closely and provide further updates on.
We do regularly review all ideas here, and your input is vital. We'll…
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Height
commented
yes Please. Our contact data is imported from a job management system and only allows one primary contact email. But we need the ability to add different emails for accounts.
In our job management system for example the primary contact for our suppliers is for purchase orders, whereas in Xero we need to be able to email the accounts department for remittances.
Lisa Height
supported this idea
·
Also for allowances that are meant to be paid as reimbursements ie overtime meal allowances. These have a set rate. we should be able to set these up the same as we can allowances.
Or to make the whole thing flow better just make allowances able to be not reportable for STP (ie payment summaries).