Settings and activity
10 results found
-
865 votes
Hi community, we value there are many different aspects within new invoicing where our invoicing users can see small changes to flows and actions could make a big difference to your workflow and experience.
I can assure you we’re engaged, we’re listening and we’re taking all your feedback into consideration as we keep building on new invoicing.
While we’ll continue to keep you updated on specific releases that relate to things that’ve been mentioned in this idea, our teams have also begun some research to get a deepened sense of our invoicing users for future improvements. We’d like to connect with you all in this idea, and invite you to share further feedback through our survey. Your insights will be invaluable to the team as they continue to plan and prioritise in this space.
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
268 votes
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
442 votes
Hi everyone, thank you for all the interest and we appreciate the needs for those using foreign currency to have more efficiency in how you process these bills for payment. Your feedback and votes here have not gone unnoticed - We have a team that have been doing some ground work in this space and at this time we have beta that we'd like to invite any UK customers to join and feedback to our team on the experience. If you'd like to be a part of this please fill in our form here and we'll be in touch.
We appreciate this idea is farther reaching than UK alone and while the beta is limited to this region for the time being, based on results we will look at expanding this to other places.
We'll keep you updated of further developments here.
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Phil Leary commented
Reporting a mixture of inclusive & exclusive is inconsistent and means the report is not usable.
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
1,119 votes
We appreciate wanting to see more rapid movement, everyone. Having done a lot of exploration into this area our team have a good handle on the needs to solve this, however we want to be honest that development will be some time away with the team currently focused on improving bills list views and updating add/edit bill pages. For the time being to keep you up to date we're going to move this idea back to Submitted until more active work takes place for this.
I can assure you this idea is the best place to be leaving feedback for this feature, and Xero Product Ideas as a whole is the best place to be sharing where you'd like to see change across Xero products. As a community team we're advocating on your behalf constantly to see where ideas can be worked on, and this site is where our product…
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
785 votes
Hi everyone, we appreciate wanting to hear from us on this idea and apologies for not commenting sooner. I can assure you this has not gone unnoticed and internally there have been reviews and discussions for how batch payments can be improved. We have the appetite, but as with all developments this must be weighed up and considered against many other important changes needed in product.
We want to be upfront that developing the ability to include Credit notes in Batch payments has not been planned at this stage.
As some may have seen, we do have work going on around being able to include Credit Notes as part of the reconciliation process. We understand for many on this idea the timing of including credit notes when you’re creating the batch payments is crucial, however we hope that when delivered at least being able to reconcile these more efficiently…
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
-
196 votes
Phil Leary supported this idea ·
Without the introduction of multiple month placeholders such as [Invoice date month], [Current date month], [Due date month], I cannot understand why you would change the default month placeholder from being the month of the invoice date to the month of current date.
Whoever made this decision has clearly never worked in a finance function.
Why was a change made to the default [month] placeholder methodology without consultation? Many of Xero's customers will have templates set up to automatically invoice their own customers and you have just changed an underlying principal of that automation without telling anyone.