Settings and activity
5 results found
-
3 votes
Katie Oliver
shared this idea
·
-
46 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Katie Oliver
supported this idea
·
-
1,269 votes
Thanks for your continued engagement and valuable feedback on this long-standing idea, everyone. We've been carefully reviewing your comments and want to acknowledge the clear sentiment of frustration regarding the current limitations around managing multiple addresses for contacts, particularly for invoicing and delivery purposes, and that this is a critical feature to many of you.
We want to share an update on our progress here - We're pleased to confirm that the foundational work for handling multiple addresses has been completed within the Contacts area of Xero. This was a crucial first step. Building on this, now that all customers are on the new invoicing experience our product team has moved into the discovery phase for adding multiple addresses directly within invoicing. This means they are actively exploring the best way to implement this functionality to meet your needs effectively.
We appreciate your patience as we work through the complexities…
Katie Oliver
supported this idea
·
-
644 votes
Hi community, we appreciate your continued feedback on having different default email addresses for various transaction types in Xero contacts, and the manual steps involved to ensure you're communicating with the right person for different purposes.
Currently, one way of managing this in Xero would be to include every additional person on a contact record in emails, and then removing those that aren't required when sending each transaction. However we totally get this isn't the ideal solution.
While being able to set different email addresses for differing transaction types is something we want to address longer term, like the idea for multiple addresses work for this feature requires cross-collaboration between teams in order to achieve.
Once the multiple addresses feature is live this is something we'll be able to consider more closely and provide further updates on.
We do regularly review all ideas here, and your input is vital. We'll…
Katie Oliver
supported this idea
·
-
138 votes
Hi team, thank you for engaging with us on your needs around auto super. I want to confirm that our product team are aware of your interest in this here.
Right now, there are a few other items that need their immediate attention, so while there are no immediate plans for developing this, it's something they'll continue to review as resource becomes available. If there is any change to share around this we'll update you all through this idea.
An error occurred while saving the comment Katie Oliver
commented
At least 2 people to authorise so that if one is away and uncontactable there is a backup.
Katie Oliver
supported this idea
·
Basic example of summary required is in the picture below. This layout basically contains the details of the Profit and Loss by Tracking Categories report but as a summary and without General Ledger Accounts. The current profit and loss only allows the tracking categories to be across the top as columns but sometimes you just want a summary of the Categories themselves and if you have lots of categories it is easier to read having them down the page as rows instead.
The Tracking Category summary report shows them as rows but only allows you to show one section of general ledger accounts at a time.
The Account Transaction report filtered by category only shows a detailed view, not a summary and doesn’t show the net profit at the bottom.
I use tracking categories for fundraising events and activities of our non profit. It would be great for our committee volunteers could view this information quickly without having to add things up themselves or change in excel.
I’m sure a drill down function would be great for this too, but this format would be a great start.
An option to hide category options with 0 in both income and expense would be required, as would a filter to choose which tracking category header you are doing the report for and dates.
I imagine this would also work well for funded projects.