Invoices - Reuse invoice number if voided
Ability to reuse invoice number if voided, so the next invoice will use the number from the voided invoice.
Purpose: Ease of reference and to make the list of invoices cleaner to manage
-
Nathan Apter
commented
One more area where the Xero system is unbelievably stupid.
I can delete an invoice. I can void an invoice. But I can't delete a voided invoice. Makes no sense.
I can change an invoice number before voiding, then void. Why can't I change it once its voided if I forgot to do it?
This causes serious issues when attempting to integrate Xero with anything else.
So frustrating.
-
James Cooper
commented
Why isn't this a feature?
-
Geoff Day
commented
We all make mistakes and need to be able to fix them
We need this feature now
-
Ummara Fatima
commented
Need this feature!
-
Victoria Willment
commented
Yes please. Doesn't allow any room for error.
-
Yndys Gourdet
commented
Why isn't this feature already created?
-
JASON Kennedy
commented
Absolutely essentially. Please fix this bug.
-
Demi Hogan
commented
Need this feature!
-
Anirudh Pillala
commented
need this feature.
-
Chris Vatalaro
commented
Should be possible.
-
Chong Lim Gea
commented
having to vote for something that should be a basic feature. lmao.
-
Samuel Schlecht
commented
Agree with all comments, needs to happen some way.
-
Jane Farmer
commented
I agree with other users that this is such an easy trap to fall into so there should be an easy escape route
-
Michael Dyatchenko
commented
should be basic, or at least unvoid the invoice and scramble the number
-
Joel Dixon
commented
I agree with the comments - should be a basic function
-
Sayali Yevale
commented
Yes please, I agree.
-
Tiarna Nouwland
commented
This feature should be a given
-
Kate Elias
commented
Agree with all the comments - seems basic to allow this feature of un-voiding an invoice.
-
Chris Askew
commented
For goodness sake! I am new to Xero and this is the second time today that I've had to visit product ideas to upvote something that so obviously should be a core feature. Not impressed.
-
Paul Webster
commented
Seems crazy that this isn't a basic function