Settings and activity
12 results found
-
203 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
202 votes
Hi team, we’ve begun rolling out our new Reporting permissions, marking a major shift toward more flexible, configurable roles in Xero.
You’ll soon be able to grant Invoice only Sales or Purchase users access to specific operational reports without exposing access to all of the organisation's reports.
We’re currently in a phased release and expect these changes to be available to all users over the coming weeks.
I’ll swing back again to confirm once these changes are live to all users.
An error occurred while saving the comment Bryan Swintek
commented
YES this please! The issue we run into is when clients need to issue invoices and see reports we are publishing, the "Standard" role is the only role that currently permits this. Hoever the Standard role also grants them the ability to reconcile transactions. This is a NIGHTMARE for us when we have a client who is too hands on and starts undoing our work or does our work without our knowledge - all leading to extra work for us and, worst of all, an awkward interaction between us and our clients where we need to kindly reprimand them. Please save us from this awkward position!
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
239 votes
Hi everyone, thanks for continuing to share your feedback and explain how important it is to be able to add dates to individual line items on invoices.
While this specific idea isn't directly in our pipeline at present, we're looking more broadly at how we may extend documents to better suit more of our customers' needs. We'll be taking this idea into close consideration as part of that work.
For now, as noted in my last update the best option to accommodate this in lieu of a direct field is to add the detail to the Description field of the line.
If there's any progress, we'll be sure to let you all know here.
An error occurred while saving the comment Bryan Swintek
commented
Omg can you guys please just do this already! Would have been a way beter feature to roll out now instead of the new contact pop up box that gets in the way when setting up rules!
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
185 votes
Thanks for your feedback, everyone. We really appreciate you sharing your thoughts and the needs you've expressed about how auto linking recurring invoices to projects would save time, and give you more insights into project profitability.
The primary way to link repeating invoice line items to a project is to manually assign them to the project once the invoice has been generated, though we know you're looking for ways to streamline this process.
We've carefully reviewed all your comments and the strong desire for this functionality, however after much consideration, we've decided that we won't be developing the ability to assign repeating invoices to projects in the foreseeable future.
We understand this news might be disappointing, especially for those who've been vocal about this need for some time. Decisions like these are always tough. We have to balance a wide range of requests and development priorities across all aspects of…
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Hi everyone! thank you so much for taking the time to share your idea with us! We really appreciate you flagging that the sorting function on cash coding isn't quite sorting the blanks first, but instead is just going straight from ascending to descending by date (or vice versa). We are moving this idea over now so it can gather more support from the rest of the community. Please feel free to share it with any of your peers who would also love to see this feature implemented.
We'll be keeping a close eye on this space in the meantime. Thanks again for your valuable input.
An error occurred while saving the comment Bryan Swintek
commented
Add the ability to sort by Account. This is helpful when reviewing transactions in bulk to double check that rules have been applied correctly.
Also improve the logic currently used to sort. It should sort A-Z followed by blanks OR start with blanks and then follow Z-A. In the screenshot you'll see I'm sorting on Description but it has sorted the transactions by Date first and THEN Description, leading to a sort view that isn't helpful.
Bryan Swintek
shared this idea
·
-
10 votes
Hi everyone, just a quick update to let you know we’ve reviewed this idea and marked it as Gaining Support.
The suggestion to add floating headers in the cash coding screen makes a lot of sense, especially for those of you working through long lists of transactions.
We’re keeping an eye on how much interest this gets, so if it’s something that would help you, feel free to add your vote or leave a comment. That kind of input really helps when we're looking at what to prioritise next.
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesBryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
Appreciate familiarity to the way your clients may have worked with another system.
As noted in the initial idea while there's specifically a report for uncoded statement lines, the Bank Reconciliation report will provide a list of all statement lines (coded and uncoded) - Is there something missing within this report that you're looking for in this?
@Wayne, livestock trading is quite different to what's being asked for in this thread - you can join the idea for this across here.
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
85 votes
Heya team, with some of the exploration our team were doing we shifted this idea to Under review a few months ago. However, reassessing current priorities as many here may also be interested in our team are currently in the depths of work for enabling the ability to view more statement lines and providing search on the Reconcile screen.
While this may be something we consider developing for later down the line, it's not something we have plans for atm and we'll shift back to Submitted to continue monitoring the interest here. Thanks
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
145 votes
Hi everyone, there’s been plenty of great discussion around this idea, and we get how being able to copy bank rules would take a lot of repetition out of setup work.
It’s something we’d like to make happen, but with other priorities in this space right now hasn't been something we can add to the roadmap yet.
It may come to life as part of the ongoing improvements in the Bank Reconciliation area, and we'll defintiely let you know here if there's any progress.
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
✨ Thanks for the suggestion – we love hearing how we could make bank feeds easier to manage.
Right now we’re not planning a single “refresh all bank feeds” button in the near future. A few reasons why:
- Banks control timing: Many feeds update on a schedule set by the bank or provider, so a global refresh wouldn’t guarantee instant data across all accounts.
- Reliability & limits: Triggering lots of refreshes at once can hit provider limits and make refreshes fail more often, which is a worse experience overall.
- Security & MFA: Some feeds require multi‑factor authentication or a specific user to refresh, which can’t safely be handled by a single bulk action.
For now we’re focusing on keeping per‑account refresh reliable and clear in the new homepage banking widget, and we’ll keep tracking interest in bulk refresh for future planning.
Bryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesBryan Swintek
supported this idea
·
![IMG_3071[1].JPG 7902 KB](/assets/241730993/IMG_3071%5B1%5D.JPG){kind=link}
![IMG_3071[1].JPG 7902 KB](/assets/241730954/IMG_3071%5B1%5D.JPG){kind=link}
Please roll this feature out!