Settings and activity
42 results found
-
2 votes
Appreciate you bringing this to the community. Having the Export button in the same place across Xero could make navigation more intuitive.
I’ve updated the status to Gaining Support so we can continue tracking interest. If this would help your day-to-day work, add your vote and let us know which location you’d prefer best.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Hi Kerrin, thanks for raising this. It’s easy to see how automatically hiding custom formula rows with no activity would make reports cleaner and easier to read.
Without this option, reports can feel cluttered. That often means sharing something that looks busier than it needs to be, or exporting the report just to remove empty rows manually—extra work that defeats the purpose of using the report builder.
I’ve moved this idea to Gaining Support so we can better understand interest in more report-level formatting options. If you’re able to comment with the specific reports where this would be most useful, it’ll help other users understand the use case and help the idea gain traction.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Hi Sam, really appreciate you coming into our Xero Support team about this so we could get a closer look into the behaviour that you've mentioned.
I've re-opened this and slightly adjusted the title of your idea now that we have a clearer picture. Just to highlight for others coming across - currently when you export a report to Excel the formula in the column takes precedence over the total calculation.
There are no plans for changing this at this time, however we'd like to get a wider sense of thew interest through the idea here so that our product teams can consider this in future planning. Thank you
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Thanks for sharing this suggestion — we can see how adding “as at time of publish” to the DATE / PERIOD would make it much easier to tell which published spreadsheet is the most up to date when reports look otherwise identical.
We’re moving this idea to Gaining Support so we can keep tracking interest and feedback from our community. While we can’t make any promises about if or when this might be added, the support and examples shared here help our product team better understand the impact and usefulness of this change 💥
If there are any updates to share, we’ll post them here.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Thanks for continuing to support this idea, and letting us know the changes that matter most for you.
We've reviewed the idea and found another similar idea that we have merged with this, and now it's up to the community to get behind and support it. Make sure you share your idea with any colleagues that this could benefit so they can add their vote too!
Along with votes, other members can now comment to share additional detail about how your idea could improve their experience with Xero.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Hi Ian, thanks for bringing our attention to this. We can see how having account codes displayed in their own column, rather than combined with the account name, could make reporting easier to read and work with.
At the moment, account codes and names are shown together when the option is enabled in reports, and can be split manually after export if needed for further analysis.
I've updated the status of this idea to Gaining Support so we can continue tracking interest from the community. If there are particular reports or workflows where separate columns would be most useful, we'd love to hear more about them.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
105 votesReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Hi Pieter, thanks for starting the conversation around this. Being able to include additional reports, such as the Payroll Employee Summary, in Management report packs could make it easier to create complete management and client reporting packs without needing to combine documents manually.
I've updated the status of this idea to Gaining Support so we can continue tracking community interest. If there are other reports you'd like to include in the report packs, let us know which ones would be most valuable for your reporting workflows.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Thanks for sharing this idea. We understand the request for a unified audit report that filters by both Posting Date and Transaction Date, rather than relying on separate reports to review transaction activity.
I’ve updated the status to Gaining Support so we can continue tracking community interest. Add your vote if this would improve your audit workflow.
Regarding your idea on suppliers' statement reconciliation, I have split this idea and merged with a similar suggestion to continue tracking interest separately.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
56 votes
-
17 votes
Thanks for sharing, Deon. Appreciate how this would be useful for your business and getting an overview of transactions within a period.
Make sure you share your idea with any colleagues that this could benefit so they can add their vote too.
We'll keep a track on the interest your idea builds here and share if there is any progress.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Hey Jon, thanks for sharing this idea. Being able to sort and filter manual journals from the Manual Journals screen would make things a lot easier, especially when you're trying to track something down quickly.
We really appreciate you calling out how this could save time and help streamline your workflow. While some sorting/filtering is possible via the Manual Journal screen, we get that it’s not quite the same and adds a few extra steps.
This idea’s now in the Gaining Support stage. Every vote and comment helps us understand how useful this would be for the wider Xero community and gives our product team more insight when planning what’s next.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Appreciate your suggestion here. We can see how more streamlined tabbing through fields in Manual Journals could support faster keyboard-driven data entry and a more consistent workflow.
We've moved this idea to Gaining Support so we can continue gathering interest from the community.
If there are specific parts of the tab sequence you'd like to see improved, please continue to share them here. That context is valuable for the team as they review this idea.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Hi team, appreciate raising this idea with us. As noted by others right now it is possible to delete a repeating journal.
If you need to repeat the journal again in the future you could turn one of the previously posted journals into a Repeat journal to start this up again.
We don't have any plans for adding an archive option in the short term but will continue to watch the interest for this here.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Thanks for sharing this idea. We understand the request to allow draft manual journals to be saved with $0.00 or blank amounts.
Being able to save the account codes and journal structure without entering placeholder figures could make it easier to reuse the journal as template.
I’ve updated the status to Gaining Support so we can continue tracking community interest. If this would improve your workflow, add your vote and let us know how you currently manage recurring journal templates.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Hi community, we appreciate your input and letting us now how the new manual journals experience has landed for you.
Recently we have released a few changes;
While Journal Narration (formerly Title) doesn't wrap on the Journal list, you can now choose which columns do appear so can reduce the view of unnecessary information you do't want to see, and you also have a Compact view option to really maximise the amount of information shown on one page.
For very long journal titles, while this may not all be visible from the list, you can hover on it to view the complete entry.
It'd be great to get your fresh feedback here if these have helped with your needs in this idea.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
Hi team, we'd like to provide another update as the two features we mentioned we were working on in our last update have now been released!
Fro the journal list and within the individual journal details view the Column option will allow you to choose which types of data are shown/hidden from the page, and you can drag and drop from the 6 dots to the left to re-order these as you choose.
Beneath these you'll also be able to toggle a Compact view on or of. When on this condenses information and reduces padding to allow you to see more information on the page.
Being open, this new experience will eventually replace the older one and we cannot continue to maintain both experiences in tandem indefinitely.
We'll continue to evaluate the feedback and support here - for example recent feedback on the Tracking columns is good to hear. I'll…
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Hi team, we value your feedback here.
While not directly within Xero we wanted to highlight that this capability is available through Syft Analytics. With Syft you can create categories or groups in a report layout and expand or collapse them dynamically while viewing financial reports.
Syft Analytics is available as an add-on for accounting practices and customers on some Xero plans.
Thanks again for your feedback and for helping us understand how this'd improve your reporting workflow, while it's not in our roadmap currently we're continuing to keep a close watch on the interest here for future planning. I'll share if there are any updates.
An error occurred while saving the comment ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Thanks for your idea, Karen. Understand how this would improve efficiency if you regularly create multiple batches in your workflow. We'll get a sense of the wider community interest in this from your idea here.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Hi everyone, thanks so much for taking the time to share this idea and explain the impact it’s having on your payment runs.
We can absolutely see how splitting one payment run into multiple batches adds extra steps and complexity to the process, especially for organisations managing a high volume of bills.
Because of the support and detail we’re seeing on this idea, we’re moving it to Gaining Support. This helps us better understand how many customers are affected and the different ways this limit is impacting their workflow.
Please keep the feedback coming — if you can, add a comment with a bit more detail about how many bills you’re typically paying in a batch and how this affects your process. That context is really helpful for our team.
Thanks again for raising it and for helping us build a better experience 💙.
ReVision Accounts
supported this idea
·
so yes we can have it as long as we pay for it, seems like basic functionality that should be built into the basic reporting.